Feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih randomized controlled trial in senior female cancer survivors.
Title | Feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih randomized controlled trial in senior female cancer survivors. |
Publication Type | Journal Article |
Year of Publication | 2013 |
Authors | Campo RA, O'Connor K, Light KC, Nakamura Y, Lipschitz DL, LaStayo PC, Pappas L, Boucher K, Irwin MR, Agarwal N, Kinney AY |
Journal | Integr Cancer Ther |
Volume | 12 |
Issue | 6 |
Pagination | 464-74 |
Date Published | 2013 Nov |
ISSN | 1552-695X |
Keywords | Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Patient Compliance, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Social Support, Survivors, Tai Ji |
Abstract | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of a Tai Chi Chih (TCC) intervention in senior female cancer survivors with physical functioning limitations, and its effects on health-related quality of life (QOL). DESIGN: This was a two-armed, parallel group, RCT with 12-weeks of Tai Chi Chih or Health Education Control. METHODS: Sixty-three senior (M age = 67 years, SD = 7.15) female cancer survivors (83% breast cancer, stages I-III) with physical functioning limitations (SF-12 Health Survey role-physical & physical functioning subscales) were randomized to 12-weeks of TCC or Health Education control (HEC). Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Secondary outcomes included health-related QOL (SF-36 Health Survey), and participants' qualitative feedback on the intervention. RESULTS: Retention (TCC = 91%; HEC = 81%) and class attendance (TCC = 79%; HEC = 83%) rates, and satisfaction levels for both study arms were high, but did not significantly differ from one another. At one-week post-intervention, none of the SF-36 scores differed between the TCC and HEC groups. Within-group analyses revealed significant improvements in the mental component summary score in TCC (p = 0.01), but not in HEC. Qualitative analyses indicated that the TCC group felt they received mental and physical benefits, whereas HEC group reported on social support benefits and information received. CONCLUSION: The TCC intervention was found to be a feasible and acceptable modality for senior female cancer survivors. Future, larger definitive trials are needed to clarify TCC dosage effects on QOL in this vulnerable population. |
DOI | 10.1177/1534735413485418 |
Alternate Journal | Integr Cancer Ther |
PubMed ID | 23620504 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC3831606 |
Grant List | P30 CA042014 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States R21 CA135250 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States R21 CA135250-02 / CA / NCI NIH HHS / United States |